Developing internal agreements is often a gradual process
Internal agreements generally develop over time as a system identifies a need. They often develop as communication and awareness within the system increase. Many agreements first start informally and then may become more intentional over time. Although it’s ideal to have the buy-in of all parts, it is not necessary that everyone fully agrees at the beginning. In many systems, agreements begin with partial participation and expand over time.
Many agreements begin by noticing patterns
Often, a dissociative system notices some recurring situation where coordination would help. This might be:
- a repeated internal conflict
- confusion about decisions
- situations where different responses create difficulty
Recurring confusion or conflict is often a signal that an internal agreement may be helpful.
Developing internal awareness and communication
In order to develop internal agreements that many in the system can agree to, it is first necessary to have awareness of different perspectives within the system. Priorities, needs, and concerns can be as varied as the members of a system. Some basic level of communication is helpful in identifying agreement and disagreement related to forming internal agreements. This does not mean easy back-and-forth speech in headspace is required. Some systems communicate well using communication apps or a notebook. Others communicate directly in headspace. And other systems may communicate through imagery or body sensations.
More important than how communication occurs is being able to understand what the part is trying to convey. In fact, understanding others in the system is often a prerequisite to agreement.
Starting small and letting agreements take shape
Agreements often begin with specific, low-stakes situations. They are likely to be simple in the beginning and may become more detailed or comprehensive as the system gains experience with internal agreements. Some agreements may be temporary or situational. Over time, agreements can become clearer or more consistent.
Agreements may change over time
Agreements are not meant to be fixed or unchangeable. They may be adjusted as circumstances change, communication improves, or new needs become clear.
It is common for agreements to evolve over time as more of the system becomes aware of shared needs and priorities.
Why creating and maintaining internal agreements can be challenging
Within a system it is likely that there are multiple and conflicting priorities between parts. For example, some parts may prioritize establishing external relationships while other parts view those relationships as dangerous. Creating an internal agreement requires negotiating these different points of view and priorities to arrive at some compromise.
Sometimes, because of the dissociation, some parts may be unaware of agreements and may therefore violate them unintentionally. Dissociation itself can also make consistency more difficult. Changes in who is present, differences in awareness, and shifts in state can all affect whether agreements are remembered or followed in a given moment.
Dissociation can make holding the agreement consistently difficult. Past experiences may make cooperation or trust harder. For example, two parts who have hard feeling about each other might be reluctant to compromise or work together for an agreement. If safety, predictability, or collaboration were not consistently available in earlier relationships with caregivers, similar patterns may show up internally. This can make it more difficult for parts to rely on each other or feel confident that agreements will be respected.
Important considerations
Agreements are meant to support safety, functioning, and coordination. They should be voluntary and not meant to control or override other parts. The goal is to create shared understanding.
Some parts may be reluctant to participate at first and this is to be expected. Often their comfort will grow as they see how the agreement is helpful to the system as a whole.
Progress is often gradual and uneven. Agreements may need to be revisited, adjusted, or rebuilt over time as communication improves and new needs become clear.
Even small steps can be meaningful. Partial agreements, temporary understandings, or limited cooperation can still support increased safety and coordination within the system.
One way to get greater buy-in can be to propose an experiment: use the internal agreement for a week or two and then get feedback about it. When hesitant parts know the agreement is time-limited and open to feedback, they may feel more willing to participate.
Seeing what this can look like
Internal agreements can feel abstract at first. It can be helpful to see examples of how they might take shape in different areas of life, especially when you’re unsure what counts as an agreement or how specific they can be. For more information, see Examples of Internal Agreements for Dissociative Systems
Learn more:
Struggling with internal conflict, risk, or unpredictability in your system?
Many dissociative systems use internal agreements to reduce harm and create structure. System Safety and Internal Agreements explains how shared rules, crisis plans, and system-level boundaries can support safety and stability.
Have a question this page didn’t answer? Click “Yes” or “No” below and a comment box will appear where you can leave your question. Comments are reviewed but not made public.